En esta vida todo es cuestión de moral, la forma en la que vives y en la que te relacionas se rigen por las normas morales de la sociedad. El problema es distinguir los tipos de moral en los días que corren en los que casi todo está permitido menos lo que algunos consideran inmoral.
Tu abuela puede ver programas llenos de gentuza en los que difaman a cualquiera y se meten con todos los muertos pero tu no puedes ver una simple serie porque salen culos y tetas. La sociedad en si es inmoral aunque tratemos de creer que no es así, prueba de ello es el siguiente test. Me apuesto un céntimo (porque soy rico y puedo permitírmelo) a que más de la mitad de la gente tiene una moral relajada y a que casi nadie de nuestros lectores le sale que es totalmente moralista.
En este enlace puedes hacer un test de moralidad en el que te dirá lo depravado que eres. Al principio es un poco coñazo pero son solo 9 preguntas y la última le va a perecer graciosa y asquerosa a más de uno.
A ver quién es el primer valiente en poner su puntuación en los comentarios.
Results
Your Moralising Quotient is: 0.42.
Your Interference Factor is: 0.00.
Your Universalising Factor is: 1.00.
What do these results mean?
Are you thinking straight about morality?
Although you do not evaluate the actions depicted in these scenarios to be across the board wrong, it is not entirely clear why you think that anything in them is morally problematic. You don’t think an action can be morally wrong if it is entirely private and no one, not even the person doing the act, is harmed by it. Yet the actions described in these scenarios are private like this and it was specified as clearly as possible that they didn’t involve harm. Possibly an argument could be made that the people undertaking these actions are in some way harmed by them. But you don’t think that an action can be morally wrong solely for the reason that it harms the person undertaking it. So even this doesn’t seem to be enough to make the actions described in these scenarios wrong in terms of your moral outlook. It is a bit of a puzzle!
Pese a que yo lo entiendo, estaría mejor que fuera en castellano, lo digo porque tiene terminos bastante específicos… Pero bueno Soy un puzzle curioso de moral :)
Tienes razón, se me ha olvidado avisar pero bueno interné es lo que tiene. Para los que tengáis dudas de palabras específicas podéis consultarlas en http://www.wordreference.com que traduce bastante bien incluso palabras coloquiales.
Si queréis podéis pegar el enlace de la página de resultados aquí y así podemos ver en qué parte del cuadro habéis quedado.
Me temo que mis resultados no han sido tan buenos como los tuyos mi estimado Z1P1. Era de esperar xD.
Estos son mis resultados:
Results
Your Moralising Quotient is: 0.29.
Your Interference Factor is: 0.25.
Your Universalising Factor is: 0.50.
What do these results mean?
http://ow.ly/1kPK9
jooo tarda mucho en llegar???
Que es esto??? porque no ponen mi mierda!!!?!?!
The purpose of the TPM Online maling list is to keep people informed
about The Philosophers’ Magazine and its associated web site, TPM
Online (www.philosophers.co.uk). Emails are sent out approximately
once a month.
To reach the listowner, send an email to:
tpminfo-list-owner@mail-list.com
To subscribe, send an email to:
tpminfo-on@mail-list.com
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
tpminfo-off@mail-list.com
To change your address, send an email to:
tpminfo-change@mail-list.com
Whichever email address you send this message From, put your Other
email address into the Subject line.
If you have problems with the list, send an email to
listmaster@mail-list.com
Please be aware that the listmaster is NOT the listowner, so
you will need to give detailed information of the problem,
and the name of the list. Listmaster is responsible for the
correct operation of the list commands, etc., not for list
content, list offers, etc.
No hace falta que pongas tu correo. Encima de eso hay un enlace que pone click aquí para empezar el test. Le das, lo haces y te da el resultado al instante.
En tu caso igual te puedes ahorrar hacerlo xD
Results
Your Moralising Quotient is: 0.25.
Your Interference Factor is: 0.25.
Your Universalising Factor is: 0.00.
What do these results mean?
Are you thinking straight about morality?
Although you do not evaluate the actions depicted in these scenarios to be across the board wrong, it is not entirely clear why you think that anything in them is morally problematic. You don’t think an action can be morally wrong if it is entirely private and no one, not even the person doing the act, is harmed by it. Yet the actions described in these scenarios are private like this and it was specified as clearly as possible that they didn’t involve harm. Maybe, despite these stipulations, you just can’t believe no harm would have resulted. The trouble is that you were asked to judge the scenarios as described, not as you think they would have turned out in the real world. And given how they were described, it isn’t clear what form such harms could take…
me lo traducis un poco???
Viene a decir lo que todos sabemos
, que no tienes moral :P.